Discussions
Category

By In Announcements, Discussions, Normative Ethics Comments Off on Politics, Philosophy & Economics Discussions at Pea Soup: Juliana Bidadanure’s ‘Making Sense of Age-Group Justice’

Politics, Philosophy & Economics Discussions at Pea Soup: Juliana Bidadanure’s ‘Making Sense of Age-Group Justice’

We are thrilled to have our first Politics, Philosophy & Economics online discussion in Pea Soup’s new format.

On the 28th of September 2016  we will be discussing Juliana Bidadanure‘s outstanding paper “Making Sense of Age-Group Justice: A Time for Relational Equality?”. Juliana offers a cutting-edge contribution to our understanding of intergenerational inequality. The paper is available here.

We have an excellent line-up of academic experts to discuss Juliana’s paper.  Paul Bou-Habib (Essex) will start us off with a critical précis of the paper.   David Axelssen (LSE), Paula Casal (Pompea Fabra), Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (Aarhus), Martin O’Neill (York) and Christian Schemmel (Manchester) will offer their comments. Do join us!

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more

By In Discussions, Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup Comments (19)

Ethics Discussion at PEA Soup: Joshua Gert’s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem,” with a critical précis by Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson

6a00d83452b89569e201b8d1c673b1970cWelcome to what we expect will be a very interesting discussion of Joshua Gert‘s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem.” The paper is published in the most recent edition of Ethics and is available through open access here. Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson have kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis, and it appears immediately below. Please join in the discussion!

(more…)

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more

By In Discussions Comments Off on Upcoming Ethics Discussion, July 14-16: Joshua Gert’s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem,” with a critical précis by Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson

Upcoming Ethics Discussion, July 14-16: Joshua Gert’s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem,” with a critical précis by Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson

We’re excited to announce our next Ethics discussion, which will be about Joshua Gert‘s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem.” The paper is available through open access here. Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson have kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis.  Join us July 14-16!

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more

By In Discussions Comments Off on Upcoming Ethics Discussion, Apr 18-20: Dale Dorsey’s “Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry,” with a critical précis by Kathryn M Lindeman

Upcoming Ethics Discussion, Apr 18-20: Dale Dorsey’s “Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry,” with a critical précis by Kathryn M Lindeman

We’re excited to announce our next Ethics discussion on Dale Dorsey‘s “Moral Distinctiveness and Moral Inquiry.” The paper is available through open access here. Kathryn M Lindeman has kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis. Join us on April 18-20!

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more

By In Discussions, Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup Comments (30)

Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup: Katharine Jenkins’ “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” with précis by Talia Bettcher

Welcome to what should be an exciting discussion of Katharine Jenkins’ “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” published in the most recent issue of Ethics and available open access here. Talia Bettcher has kindly contributed a critical précis, below the fold. Please join us!

(more…)

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more

By In Discussions Comments Off on Upcoming Ethics Discussion, Jan 27-29: Katharine Jenkins’ “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of a Woman,” with a précis by Talia Bettcher

Upcoming Ethics Discussion, Jan 27-29: Katharine Jenkins’ “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of a Woman,” with a précis by Talia Bettcher

We are excited to announce our first Ethics discussion of 2016, on Katharine Jenkins' "Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of a Woman," published in the most recent issue of Ethics and available open access here. Talia Bettcher has kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis. The discussion is scheduled for Jan 27-29. Please join us!

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more

By In Discussions Comments Off on Oxford Studies discussions at PEA Soup — Launching New Series on Sep 30 – Oct 2

Oxford Studies discussions at PEA Soup — Launching New Series on Sep 30 – Oct 2

I’m excited to announce that we’re starting a new series of discussions on PEA Soup, on various Oxford Studies volumes. The discussions will be modeled after our existing Ethics and JESP discussions.

For our first discussion, we’ll be talking about John Brunero‘s essay “Cognitivism about Practical Rationality” in Oxford Studies in Metaethics Vol 9. The essay is available through this link for a few months, courtesy of OUP. Kieran Setiya has kindly contributed a commentary. Please join us on Sep 30 – Oct 2!

We’re hoping to roll out some more discussions in the coming months, including on the new OSME 10 volume. Many thanks to the folks at OUP and to the volume editors for making this possible!

 

Love this idea? Nominate it for the Annual PEA Soup Awards!

Read more