Discussions
Category

By In Discussions, JMP Discussions, Normative Ethics Comments (32)

Journal of Moral Philosophy Discussion at PEA Soup: Molly Gardner’s “On the Strength of the Reason Against Harming,” with a critical précis by Fiona Woollard

Welcome to what will surely be an incredibly interesting and productive discussion of Molly Gardner‘s excellent paper “On the Strength of the Reason Against Harming.” This paper was published in the first issue of this year’s Journal of Moral Philosophy. They have kindly provided free access to the paper, which can be viewed or downloaded here. Fiona Woollard has written a critical précis, which is included below. Please join today’s discussion!

(more…)

Read more

By In Discussions, Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup, Moral Psychology, Normative Ethics, Practical Rationality Comments (41)

Ethics Discussion at PEA Soup: Abe Roth’s “Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation,” with a critical précis by Sarah Stroud

Welcome to what we expect will be a very interesting and productive discussion of Abe Roth‘s “Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation.” The paper is published in the most recent edition of Ethics and is available through open access here. Sarah Stroud has kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis, and it appears immediately below. Please join in the discussion!

(more…)

Read more

By In Discussions, Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup, Moral Psychology, Normative Ethics Comments Off on Upcoming Ethics Discussion, October 27-29: Abe Roth’s “Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation,” with a critical précis by Sarah Stroud

Upcoming Ethics Discussion, October 27-29: Abe Roth’s “Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation,” with a critical précis by Sarah Stroud

We are excited to announce our next Ethics discussion, which will focus on Abe Roth‘s paper, “Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation”. The paper is available through open access here. A critical précis will be provided by Sarah Stroud. Join us October 27-29!

Read more

By In Discussions, Normative Ethics Comments (30)

Politics, Philosophy & Economics online discussion: Juliana Bidadanure’s ‘Making Sense of Age- Group Justice with a précis by Paul Bou-Habib

Welcome to our online discussion  of Juliana’s Bidadanure’s recent publication in Politics Philosophy & Economics ‘Making Sense of Age-Group  Justice: A Time For Relational Equality?’. The paper is available through open access here.  Paul Bou-Habib is starting us off with a critical précis.  David Axelssen (LSE), Paula Casal (Pompea Fabra), Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (Aarhus), Martin O’Neill (York) and Christian Schemmel (Manchester) will follow with their comments.  This  is going to be a very interesting exchange, so please join in!

Here’s Paul:

(more…)

Read more

By In Announcements, Discussions, Normative Ethics Comments Off on Politics, Philosophy & Economics Discussions at Pea Soup: Juliana Bidadanure’s ‘Making Sense of Age-Group Justice’

Politics, Philosophy & Economics Discussions at Pea Soup: Juliana Bidadanure’s ‘Making Sense of Age-Group Justice’

We are thrilled to have our first Politics, Philosophy & Economics online discussion in Pea Soup’s new format.

On the 28th of September 2016  we will be discussing Juliana Bidadanure‘s outstanding paper “Making Sense of Age-Group Justice: A Time for Relational Equality?”. Juliana offers a cutting-edge contribution to our understanding of intergenerational inequality. The paper is available here.

We have an excellent line-up of academic experts to discuss Juliana’s paper.  Paul Bou-Habib (Essex) will start us off with a critical précis of the paper.   David Axelssen (LSE), Paula Casal (Pompea Fabra), Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (Aarhus), Martin O’Neill (York) and Christian Schemmel (Manchester) will offer their comments. Do join us!

Read more

By In Discussions, Ethics Discussions at PEA Soup Comments (19)

Ethics Discussion at PEA Soup: Joshua Gert’s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem,” with a critical précis by Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson

6a00d83452b89569e201b8d1c673b1970cWelcome to what we expect will be a very interesting discussion of Joshua Gert‘s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem.” The paper is published in the most recent edition of Ethics and is available through open access here. Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson have kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis, and it appears immediately below. Please join in the discussion!

(more…)

Read more

By In Discussions Comments Off on Upcoming Ethics Discussion, July 14-16: Joshua Gert’s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem,” with a critical précis by Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson

Upcoming Ethics Discussion, July 14-16: Joshua Gert’s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem,” with a critical précis by Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson

We’re excited to announce our next Ethics discussion, which will be about Joshua Gert‘s “A Fitting End to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem.” The paper is available through open access here. Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson have kindly agreed to contribute a critical précis.  Join us July 14-16!

Read more